A Study of the Complex and Disputed Philosophical Questions Surrounding Human Action

(2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study presents a dualist account of the nature of human action, dualist in a modest sense in that it defends the claim that actions involve the physical and the mental and cannot be interpreted in functionalist ways.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaphysics: The Basics.Michael Cannon Rea - 2014 - New York, NY: Routledge.
The elements of rationality and chance in the choice of human action.Ernest Krausz - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4):353–374.
Who's Afraid of the Human Genome Project?Philip Kitcher - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:313-321.
The Philosophical Significance of Attention.Sebastian Watzl - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (10):722-733.
Is 'human action' A category?Arthur B. Cody - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):386-419.
Oxford handbook of human action.Ezequiel Morsella, John A. Bargh & Peter M. Gollwitzer (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references