A betting interpretation for probabilities and Dempster-Shafer degrees of belief

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When Fair Betting Odds Are Not Degrees of Belief.T. Seidenfeld, M. J. Schervish & J. B. Kadane - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:517-524.
Getting fancy with probability.Henry E. Kyburg - 1992 - Synthese 90 (2):189-203.
Scotching the dutch book argument.Peter Milne - 1990 - Erkenntnis 32 (1):105--26.
Getting Fancy with Probability.Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 1992 - Synthese 90 (2):189 - 203.
The Dempster-Shafer calculus for statisticians.Arthur Dempster - 2008 - International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48 (2):365--377.
What are degrees of belief.Lina Eriksson & Alan Hájek - 2007 - Studia Logica 86 (2):185-215.
Decision Making with Belief Functions.J. Y. Jaffray - 1994 - In R. Yager, M. Fedrizzi & J. Kacprzyk (eds.), Advances in the Dempster- Shafer Theory of Evidence. John Wiley. pp. 331-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-28

Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Formal Epistemology Meets Mechanism Design.Jürgen Landes - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (2):215-231.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references