A historical evaluation from quarantine to compartmental model: from Ottoman Empire in 1830 to the Turkish Republic at 2020 and from cholera to COVID-19

Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (6):295-98 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Ottoman Empire's first experienced quarantine and the Turkey Republic's used compartmental models within quarantine. Method: This study was conducted as a review to explore quarantine procedures applied from Ottoman Empire to the present time in the Turkey Republic. For this purpose, we collected pieces of evidence from historical texts, articles, online reports, and books to websites. The reviews findings were assessed chronologically. Results: There were findings about the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Republic. The first data was included in the quarantine directives of the Sultan II. Mahmud (1808-1839) for cholera. Moreover, the Ottoman Empire continued to fight epidemics such as the plague, cholera, smallpox, malaria, and Spanish flu. After founded, the Turkish Republic state (1923) has also encountered some infectious diseases (cholera, COVID-19) and used compartmental models within quarantine with medical measures. However, while quarantine applications were made more effective with technology, COVID-19 was held back with the old quarantine application principles at short intervals. On the other hand "compartmental models within quarantine" concepts and practices were carried out in many countries instead of only quarantine and after a while implicitly followed by many countries for economic reasons; this system was introduced, which caused controversy for economic reasons, including Turkey. Conclusion: Infectious diseases not only threaten the health of people but also threatens socio-economic life and even cultural and religious practices. For this reason, its area of influence covers a wider area, the world in all other disasters. In spite of all scientific and technological developments, infectious diseases can still not be brought under control in a short time and measures have started to evolve from quarantine, social distance practice, and herd immunity system. This study offers the opportunity to reconsider and think of quarantine practices from past to present.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Secularism” From the Last Years of the Ottoman Empire to Early Turkish Republic.Tuncay Saygin - 2008 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 7 (20):26-78.
'A civilizing mission'? Austrian medicine and the reform of medical structures in the ottoman empire, 1838–1850.Marcel Chahrour - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):687-705.
J. S. mill and the american law of quarantine.Wendy E. Parmet - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):210-222.
Ethics and public health emergencies: Restrictions on liberty.Matthew K. Wynia - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):1 – 5.
The 4S of Foucault Amid the Pandemic.Noe Santillan - 2020 - Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy 2020 (Special Issue):126-151.
COVID-19 and the ethics of quarantine: a lesson from the Eyam plague.Giovanni Spitale - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (4):603-609.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-08

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references