Art as an Autopoietic Sub-System of Modern Society

Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):75-103 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is concerned with Niklas Luhmann's theory of art which he formulated in the 1990s, based on his general theory of autopoietic systems. This theory regards modern society as a functionally differentiated formation whose sub-systems operate according to their inner principles of communication. According to this, the domain of art can also be seen as an operationally closed and self-referential communicative system. The basic problem in these notions lies in the way in which their description of the relationships existing between different systems is only in very narrow terms. Consequently they partially ignore the present process of de-differentiation which has noticeably changed the status of art in society. Instead, Luhmann's ideas expressly emphasize that functional differentiation is an ongoing process. In order to describe the process of de-differentiation, social theory does not need to abandon the concept of autopoiesis, but it does need to understand social systems as interlaced formations which, to an increasing extent, contain common normative and organizational constituents. Because social systems are not altogether self-referential formations, the concept of autopoiesis can describe them only in part. This particular concept of system has been developed in particular by Richard Münch, and as such it forms a productive alternative to the theory of autopoietic social systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critical Autopoiesis and the Materiality of Law.Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (2):389-418.
Beyond Historicism: From Leibniz to Luhmann.Jaap den Hollander - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):210-225.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Law as a Social System.Niklas Luhmann (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Who Observes? An Appropriate Theory of Observation is in Demand.H. Egner - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):12-13.
Social Autopoiesis?H. Urrestarazu - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):153-166.
The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
Living Systems: Autonomy, Autopoiesis and Enaction.Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (2):225-239.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
37 (#399,294)

6 months
8 (#241,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Rediscovering the Theological in Sociology.William J. F. Keenan - 2003 - Theory, Culture and Society 20 (1):19-42.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft.Niklas Luhmann - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (2):388-389.
Art Worlds.Howard S. Becker - 1982 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 41 (2):226-226.
Die Kunst der Gesellschaft.Niklas Luhmann - 1996 - European Journal of Philosophy 4 (3).

View all 10 references / Add more references