Public Health Ethics 11 (3):237-250 (2018)

Abstract
This article addresses an important, overlooked regulatory challenge during global health emergencies. It provides novel insights into how, and why, best practice can support decision makers in interpreting and implementing key guidance on conducting research during GHEs. The ability to conduct research before, during and after such events is crucial. The recent West-African Ebola outbreaks and the Zika virus have highlighted considerable room for improvement in meeting the imperative to research and rapidly develop effective therapies. A means of effectively capturing these experiences and folding them into future decision-making is lacking; the need for effective practical translational measures remains. The challenge for the research community lies in extracting meaningful action-guiding content from pre-existing guidelines—which draw upon practical examples of guidelines ‘in action’—that assist in determining how to act in a particular situation. Insights are provided into the role of best practice as a means to do so; such examples can provide invaluable support to decision makers in interpreting high-level guidance; overarching guidelines retain their necessary level of generality and flexibility, whilst corresponding best practice examples—which incorporate important lessons learned—illustrate how such guidelines can be interpreted at a practical level.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/phe/phy014
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Critique of Principlism.K. D. Clouser & B. Gert - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):219-236.
Foreword.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Volume 113, Number 5/6 - 2016 - the Journal of Philosophy.
Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice.Ingrid Robeyns - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (3):341-362.
Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Documentation in Practice-Led Research.Nithikul Nimkulrat - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (1):Article M6.
The 2016 CIOMS Guidelines and Publichealth Research Ethics.J. R. Williams - 2017 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 10 (2):93-95.
The Role of Research in Setting Priorities for Health Care.Kathleen N. Lohr - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):79-82.
The History of Bioethics: Implications for Current Debates in Health Research.R. E. McWhirter - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (3):329-338.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-25

Total views
6 ( #1,138,022 of 2,520,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes