- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
From genes to incest taboos
In W. H. Durham & A. P. Wolf (ed.), Incest, Inbreeding, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century. Stanford University Press. pp. 109-120 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Incest Prohibition and Food Taboos.Raoul Makarius & Elaine P. Halperin - 1960 - Diogenes 8 (30):41-61.
What is a Gene? From molecules to metaphysics.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):471-497.
The extended replicator.Kim Sterelny, Kelly C. Smith & Michael Dickison - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):377-403.
Genes: Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test.Karola Stotz & Paul Griffiths - 2004 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):5-28.
Genes and citizens: Can moral philosophy learn from evolutionary biology?Alan Haworth - 2001 - Res Publica 7 (2):137-157.
Review of genes in development: Re-reading the molecular paradigm. [REVIEW]Brant Pridmore - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (4):579-586.
What is wrong with incest?Jerome Neu - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):27 – 39.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#250,399)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#250,399)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Are moral norms rooted in instincts? The sibling incest taboo as a case study.Nathan Cofnas - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (5):47.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-v4fj8 uwo