Community with Nothing in Common? Plato's Subtler Response to Protagoras

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):155-183 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Protagoras examines how community can occur between people who have nothing in common. Community, Protagoras holds, has no natural basis. Seeking the good is therefore not a theoretical project, but a matter of agreement. This position follows from his claim that “man is the measure of all things.” For Socrates community is based on a natural good, which is sought through theoretical inquiry. They disagree about what community is, and what its bases and goals are. But Plato illustrates the seriousness of Protagoras’s position through the repeated breakdown of their conversation. The dialogue leads us to question both speakers’ assumptions about community. Socrates must face the problem that not everything can be brought to language. Protagoras must recognize that there is a basis of community even in what cannot be shared. Community is grounded in an event that is both natural and not up to us, and cultural and articulate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Natural Law Theory and the Common Good of the Political Community.Daniel Mark - 2019 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (2):293-303.
Aquinas on Law and Natural Law.Michael Baur - 2011 - In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Aquinas. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Common Good.Mark C. Murphy - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (1):133-164.
Jean‐Luc Nancy and the Myth of the Common.Andrew Norris - 2000 - Constellations 7 (2):272-295.
Common sense as an ingredient of the self and the community.Lutz Koch - 1996 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 15 (1):61-68.
What We All Know: Community in Moore's "A Defence of Common Sense".Wim Vanrie - 2021 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (4):629-651.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-27

Downloads
44 (#344,726)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Sentesy
Loyola University Maryland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references