Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games

International Journal of Game Theory 4:25-55 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Loss Aversion in Bimatrix Games.Bram Driesen, Andrés Perea & Hans Peters - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):367-391.
Common Knowledge and Games with Perfect Information.Philip J. Reny - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:363 - 369.
Introduction to Game Theory.Martin J. Osborne - 2004 - Oxford University Press USA.
Extensive games as process models.Johan van Benthem - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (3):289-313.
Games, goals, and bounded rationality.Leigh Tesfatsion - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (2):149-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Nudge.Luc Bovens - 2008 - In Mats J. Hansson & Till Grüne-Yanoff (eds.), Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology. Springer, Theory and Decision Library A. pp. 207-20.
Modeling Rational Players: Part I.Ken Binmore - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):179-214.
The chain store paradox.Reinhard Selten - 1978 - Theory and Decision 9 (2):127-159.
The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory.Joseph Heath - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):497-528.
Game theory.Don Ross - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 69 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references