- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the proof theory of the intermediate logic MH
Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (3):626-647 (1986)
Abstract
A natural deduction formulation is given for the intermediate logic called MH by Gabbay in [4]. Proof-theoretic methods are used to show that every deduction can be normalized, that MH is the weakest intermediate logic for which the Glivenko theorem holds, and that the Craig-Lyndon interpolation theorem holds for itLinks
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
A proof–theoretic study of the correspondence of hybrid logic and classical logic.H. Kushida & M. Okada - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):35-61.
Interpolation properties of superintuitionistic logics.Larisa L. Maksimova - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (4):419 - 428.
Goal-directed proof theory.Dov M. Gabbay - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic. Edited by Nicola Olivetti.
Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Applications of weak Kripke semantics to intermediate consequences.Wolfgang Rautenberg - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (1):119 - 134.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
259 (#75,277)
6 months
13 (#182,749)
2009-01-28
Downloads
259 (#75,277)
6 months
13 (#182,749)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Subformula and separation properties in natural deduction via small Kripke models: Subformula and separation properties.Peter Milne - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):175-227.
Necessity of Thought.Cesare Cozzo - 2015 - In Heinrich Wansing (ed.), Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning. Springer. pp. 101-20.
Postponement of $$mathsf {}$$ and Glivenko’s Theorem, Revisited.Giulio Guerrieri & Alberto Naibo - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (1):109-144.
A short proof of the strong normalization of classical natural deduction with disjunction.René David & Karim Nour - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1277-1288.
References found in this work
Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study.Richmond Thomason - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):255-256.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo