Benedictine Monasticism as Reflected in the Warnefrid-Hildemar Commentaries on the Rule [Book Review]

Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 16 (2):361-362 (1941)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rule of St. Benedict and Modern Liberal Authority.Linda Zagzebski - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):65 - 84.
The phase rule and the notion of substance.Paul Needham - 2011 - In Henk W. De Regt, Stephan Hartmann & Samir Okasha (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 253-62.
Learning Chinese Philosophy with Commentaries.Tim Connolly - 2012 - Teaching Philosophy 35 (1):1-18.
Listening and Responding: Benedictine Spirituality in Non-monastic Contexts.Wil Derkse - 2000 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 3 (3).
Irish Monasticism. [REVIEW]R. R. Corrigan - 1932 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 7 (1):139-143.
Catholic Eastern Monasticism.Donald Attwater - 1933 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 8 (1):78-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
48 (#316,781)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references