The Physician as Gatekeeper to the Use of Genetic Information in the Criminal Justice System

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):88-94 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The discovery of the molecular structure of deoxyribonucleic acid and the science of molecular biology have profoundly changed medicine’s diagnostic capability and promise to transform the therapeutic realm. When some genetic disorders are diagnosed, physicians can intervene for prevention or treatment. While the basic structure of DNA is the same for all human beings, no two individuals, other than identical twins, have the same DNA sequence. This discovery has had important repercussions in the criminal justice system, where DNA can serve as an identification tool.At the crossroads of these different uses of DNA, there are great concerns about potential misuses of genetic information. Preventing disease, curing illness, and convicting criminals are all seen as worthwhile uses of the technology, but concerns of potential misuse in medicine or in the criminal justice system are not unfounded. A 1998 American Medical Association study showed that 68 percent of patients had fears that their genetic test results would be used against them by their employers or insurers. Others, pointing to racial profiling, have suggested that we may now face genetic profiling.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is there a duty to share genetic information?S. Matthew Liao - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):306-309.
Criminal Justice: An Introduction to Philosophies, Theories and Practice.Ian Marsh - 2004 - Routledge. Edited by John Cochrane & Gaynor Melville.
Dna, inference, and information.Ulrich E. Stegmann - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):1-17.
Before the law.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):219-244.
Now is the Time to Reform our Criminal Justice System.Jim Webb - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (2):163-167.
The family covenant and genetic testing.David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.
Genetic information: Important but not “exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
The nature and significance of behavioural genetic information.Ainsley Newson - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
Review essay / Dominion as the target of criminal justice.C. L. Ten - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):40-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
10 (#1,160,791)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

DNA Fingerprinting in the Twilight Zone.George J. Annas - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 20 (2):35-37.
DNA Fingerprinting in the Twilight Zone.George J. Annas - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (2):35-37.

Add more references