Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):425 – 443 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Many think that equality is an intrinsic value. However, this view, especially when based on a consequential foundation, faces familiar objections related to the claim that equality is sometimes good for none and bad for some: most notably the levelling down objection. This article explores a unique (consequential) conception of equality, as part of a more general conception of fairness concerning the resolution of interpersonal conflicts, which is not exposed to these objections.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/00048400802340600 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 34 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses.Re’em Segev - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):57-76.
Similar books and articles
On the Value of Distributional Equality.Joseph Raz - 2009 - In Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge.
Prioritarianism, Levelling Down and Welfare Diffusion.Ingmar Persson - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):307-311.
Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Inequality, Injustice and Levelling Down.Thomas Christiano & Will Braynen - 2008 - Ratio 21 (4):392-420.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-05-07
Total views
100 ( #115,597 of 2,499,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,228 )
2010-05-07
Total views
100 ( #115,597 of 2,499,228 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,228 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads