Does the SOC theory avoid unconscious rule use?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):353-353 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are striking similarities between Perruchet & Vinter's SOC theory and the theories that they claim to be in opposition to. First, both kinds of theory lead to the induction of knowledge of complex patterns in the environment that serve the function of rules. Second, both involve unconscious mental processes of induction resulting in at least some conscious knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The explanatory value of the unconscious.Michael Martin - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (April):122-132.
Trading automatic/nonautomatic for unconscious/conscious.Joseph Tzelgov - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):356-357.
The conscious and the unconscious: A package deal.Martin Kurthen - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):343-344.
The Anna Karenina Theory of the Unconscious.Ned Block - 2011 - Neuropsychoanalysis 13 (1):34-37.
Associative learning: A generalisation too far.Martin Redington - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):351-352.
The emergence of consciousness: BUC versus SOC.Ron Sun - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):355-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#641,102)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references