Methodological Relationship between Bioethics and Philosophy

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:111-114 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One can distinguish three levels in the integrative unity of knowledge and norms, which is termed as ‘bioethics’. The first level is theoretical. It is connected with the facts and truths. The second level deals with establishing of certain standards and rules of conduct, with the monitoring of their implementation and the assessment of the results of implementation of norms. The third level is associated with individual behavior, formed on the basis of relevant knowledge, and the rules governing its application. The theoretical bioethics can act and act as an applied philosophy. At the same time, all three levels of bioethics exist in unity; the relationship between them has a vector character. Theoretical bioethics development lags behind that of practical and applied, which may lead to defragmentation of the discipline in general and loss of its scientific and social status. It is possible to overcome this trend purposefully, treating axiological problems of bioethics as primary to the deontological ones.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is there an African Bioethics?Karori Mbũgua - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (1):2-4.
Bioethics as Practice of Normalization.Tatiana Sidorova - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:161-167.
The Roots of European Bioethics.Ivana Zagorac - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:149-153.
Methodological concerns in bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Abortion and euthanasia as legal and as moral issues: Some reflections on the relationship between morality, church and state.Josef Seifert - forthcoming - Bioethics Update, Proceedings of 1987 Annual Conference on Bioethics, St. Vincents Bioethics Centre, Melbourne.
Observations on the epistemological status of bioethics.Massimo Reichlin - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):79-102.
Is ‘Dignity’ a Useless Concept in Bioethics?Yuehong Han & Yunbao Yang - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:49-53.
On the Nature and Sociology of Bioethics.Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):54-69.
Issues of Humanity in Medical Ethics.Martin Gluchman - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):172-180.
Between the Secular and the Religious.Shin Fujieda - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 3:35-41.
Feminist bioethics: At the center, on the margins. [REVIEW]Robyn Bluhm - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):154-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references