Methodology of the Relationship Between Bioethics, Philosophy, and Law

Philosophy Study 3 (7) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One can distinguish three levels in the integrative unity of knowledge and norms, which is termed bioethics. The first level is theoretical. It is connected with the facts and truths. The second level deals with establishing of certain standards and rules of conduct, with the monitoring of their implementation and the assessment of the results of implementation/violation of norms. The third level is associated with individual behavior, formed on the basis of relevant knowledge, and the rules governing its application. Theoretical Bioethics is an integral part of Philosophy¾the practical Bioethics is directly related to Law and applied Bioethics deals with the personal standards of specific behavior in concrete situations. Social need for regulatory control of any activity with living entities has led to rapid development of practical Bioethics, while its philosophical content developed more slowly. This creates a conflict of norms and values, hampering the adoption of individual decisions now in the field of applied Bioethics. Deontologization of Bioethics can lead to the fact that it will lose its philosophical content and become a specific area of Law. This, in turn, leads to the dehumanization of Bioethics. It is therefore necessary to conduct a methodological analysis of the relationship of Philosophy, Bioethics and Law, the results of which will focus the researchers on the synchronization of the axiological, praxeological and ethical components of scientific research in order to preserve the intellectual integrity of Bioethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Nature and Sociology of Bioethics.Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):54-69.
The politics of bioethics.Alan R. Petersen - 2011 - New York: Routledge.
Bioethics for the 21st century: building hope.Adela Cortina - 2016 - Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética 1.
Is there an African Bioethics?Karori Mbũgua - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (1):2-4.
Interdisciplinary Bioethics on the Crossroad of Research Methods.Eliane Azevêdo - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (2):34-34.
What can history do for bioethics?Duncan Wilson - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (4):215-223.
Observing bioethics.Renée C. Fox - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Judith P. Swazey & Judith C. Watkins.
What’s the Point of Philosophical Bioethics?Iain Brassington - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):20-30.
Bioethics: The Basics: Alastair V. Campbell, 2013, Routledge.Úna Fitzgerald - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (4):553-555.
Feminist bioethics: At the center, on the margins. [REVIEW]Robyn Bluhm - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):154-159.
Observations on the epistemological status of bioethics.Massimo Reichlin - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):79-102.
Methodological concerns in bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Bioethics and history.Robert Baker - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):447 – 474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-07

Downloads
4 (#1,595,600)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references