Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence

New York: Cambridge University Press (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book represents a serious and philosophically sophisticated guide to modern American legal theory, demonstrating that legal positivism has been a misunderstood and underappreciated perspective through most of twentieth-century American legal thought. Anthony Sebok traces the roots of positivism through the first half of the twentieth century, and rejects the view that one must adopt some version of natural law theory in order to recognize moral principles in the law. On the contrary, once one corrects for the mistakes of formalism and postwar legal process, one is left with a theory of legal positivism that takes moral principles seriously while avoiding the pitfalls of natural law. The broad scope of this book ensures that it will be read by philosophers of law, historians of law, historians of American intellectual life, and those in political science concerned with public law and administration.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Between natural law and legal positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on legal theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Socio-Legal Positivism and a General Jurisprudence.Brian Z. Tamanaha - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (1):1-32.
Positivism Before Hart.Fred Schauer - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (2):455-471.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#253,035)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

John Austin.Brian Bix - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Realismo jurídico escandinavo: algunos asuntos inconclusos.Toni Malminen & Francisco J. Campos Zamora - 2019 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 50:151-173.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references