How to derive "ought" from "is"

Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

DOI

10.2307/2183201

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

You cannot derive "ought" from "is".Warren J. Samuels - 1973 - Ethics 83 (2):159-162.
How to derive morality from Hume's Maxim.Gerald Hull - manuscript
Barriers to Implication.Greg Restall - unknown
Grounding Probabilities from below.Ian Hacking - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:110 - 116.
Can we derive the principle of compositionality (if we deflate understanding)?Antonio Rauti - 2009 - Dialectica 63 (2):157-174.
Ethics and the generous ontology.Eric T. Olson - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):259-270.
You ought to derive "ought" from "is".Robert V. Hannaford - 1972 - Ethics 82 (2):155-162.
Problems with Searle’s Derivation?Edmund Wall - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,130 (#7,673)

6 months
37 (#57,528)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John R. Searle
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Rationality in Action: A Symposium.Barry Smith - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66-94.
I Ought, Therefore I Can.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (2):167-216.
Logic isn’t normative.Gillian Russell - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):371-388.
The other question: can and should robots have rights?David J. Gunkel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2):87-99.

View all 161 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references