How to derive "ought" from "is"

Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2183201

Other Versions

reprint Searle, John (1998) "How to Derive Ought from Is". In Rachels, James, Ethical theory, pp. : Oxford University Press (1998)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,061

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How to Derive “Ought” from “Is” Revisited.John R. Searle - 2021 - In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.), Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”. Springer Verlag. pp. 3-16.
How to Derive 'Ought' from 'May'.William G. Lycan - 1977 - Ratio (Misc.) 19 (1):55.
An Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of David Hume: How to Derive 'Ought' From 'Is'.Bonnie Jean Gray - 1973 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Problems with Searle’s Derivation?Edmund Wall - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.
Existence as a Source of Normativity: An Alternative to Searle’s View.Roberta De Monticelli - 2021 - In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.), Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”. Springer Verlag. pp. 121-138.
Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”.Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.) - 2021 - Springer Verlag.
How not to derive "ought" from "is".James Thomson & Judith Thomson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):512-516.
Hume’s Law Violated?Rik Peels - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (3):449-455.
It Does Not Matter Whether We Can Derive 'Ought' from 'Is'.Alison Jaggar - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):373 - 379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,371 (#11,358)

6 months
36 (#110,257)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John R. Searle
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Rationality in Action: A Symposium.Barry Smith - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66-94.
Logic isn’t normative.Gillian Russell - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):371-388.
I Ought, Therefore I Can.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (2):167-216.
Émotions et Valeurs.Christine Tappolet - 2000 - Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

View all 167 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references