Response—A Commentary on Miles Little et al. 1998. Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine 47(10): 1485-1494 [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):49-54 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper by Miles Little and colleagues identified the state they described as “liminal” within the trajectory of cancer survivorship. Since that time the concept of liminality has provided a powerful model to explore some of the difficulties experienced by people with severe and chronic illness. In this commentary I consider the expanding application of liminality not just to a widening range of medical conditions but to the consequences of therapeutic interventions as well and how this expansion has enriched and challenged its use as a conceptual tool.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response—Liminality and the Mirage of Settlement.Claire Hooker & Ian Kerridge - 2022 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):55-60.
Commentary: Being Their Worst Nightmare: On David Perusek's “Cancer, Culture, and Individual Experience”.Arthur W. Frank - 2012 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 40 (4):512-516.
Normativity unbound: Liminality in palliative care ethics.Hillel Braude - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (2):107-122.
Order, order: A ‘modest’ response to Stokoe.Tim Rapley - 2012 - Discourse Studies 14 (3):321-328.
Objective Logic of Consciousness.Venkata Rayudu Posina & Sisir Roy - forthcoming - In 14th Nalanda Dialogue.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile