Kitsch and the Social Pretense Theory of Bullshit Art

Polish Journal of Aesthetics 4 (63):47-67 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay argues that bullshit art is a meaningful concept that differs from bullshitting about art, although the two may occur in tandem. I defend what I call the social pretense theory of bullshit art. On this view, calling a work of art ‘bullshit’ highlights a discrepancy between the prestige accorded a work of art and its nonsense character. This category of aesthetic criticism plays a unique role that cannot be identified with kitsch but bears only a contingent connection to it.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kitsch and Bullshit.Thorsten Botz-Bornstein - 2015 - Philosophy and Literature 39 (2):305-321.
Different Kinds and Aspects of Bullshit.Hans Maes & Katrien8 Schaubroeck - 2006 - In Hardcastle Reisch (ed.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.
Raising the tone: Definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In G. Reisch & G. Hardcastle (eds.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 151-169.
Argumentative Bullshit.José Ángel Gascón - 2021 - Informal Logic 43 (1):289-308.
Bullshit, Truth, and Reason.Eldar Sarajlic - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (3):865-879.
Our vision and our mission: Bullshit, assertion and belief.Ben Kotzee - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):163-175.
On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
What is Bullshit?John-Michael Kuczynski - 2016 - JOHN-MICHAEL KUCZYNSKI.
H. Frankfurt, Sračka. [REVIEW]Tomas Hribek - 2008 - Filosoficky Casopis 56:291-295.
A New Take on Deceptive Advertising.Andrew Johnson - 2010 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1-4):5-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-23

Downloads
754 (#19,709)

6 months
482 (#3,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lucas Scripter
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167-198.
The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
The open work.Umberto Eco - 1989 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references