False Enemies: Malebranche, Leibniz, and the Best of All Possible Worlds

In Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume 1. New-York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 165-182 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz's polemical aim against those who claim that God could have created a better world is not Malebranche but Suarez. In fact, Leibniz and Malebranche are united in traveling the road of the commensurability of the finite world with God, in opposition to the Thomist theology.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

False Enemies: Malebranche, Leibniz, and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Emanuela Scribano - 2003 - In Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Vol I, 2003. Oup Oxford. pp. 165-182.
Malebranche and Leibniz on the best of all possible worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
L’argomento del “miracolo perpetuo” e i suoi sottintesi teologici. Ancora sui rapporti Leibniz-Malebranche.Francesco Piro - 2017 - Laboratorio dell’ISPF (5):1-20.
Leibniz and Malebranche on innate ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Miracles in the Best of all Possible Worlds: Leibniz's Dilemma and Leibniz's Razor.Gregory Brown - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1):19-39.
False Optimism? Leibniz, Evil, and the Best of all Possible Worlds.Lloyd Strickland - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):17-35.
Kontingente versus notwendige Wahrheiten und mögliche Welten bei Leibniz.Friedel Weinert - 1980 - Studia Leibnitiana 12:125.
Was Leibniz Entitled to Possible Worlds?Lynne Rudder Baker - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):57-74.
Leibniz and the vis viva controversy.Idan Shimony - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 51-73.
Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz. [REVIEW]Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:1-28.
Leibniz, Acosmism, and Incompossibility.Thomas Feeney - 2016 - In Gregory Brown & Yual Chiek (eds.), Leibniz on Compossibility and Possible Worlds. Springer. pp. 145-174.
Dieu fainéant? Bog in telesa pri Descartesu, Malebranchu in Leibnizu.Gregor Kroupa - 2005 - Filozofski Vestnik 26 (1):67-82.
Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz.Mogens Lærke - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:1-28.
Plenitude and Compossibility in Leibniz.Catherine Wilson - 2000 - The Leibniz Review 10:1-20.
Teodicee: una nota su S. Nadler, Il migliore dei mondi possibili.Vittorio Morfino - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (1):399-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):163-200.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references