Who's a Captive? Who's a Victim? Response to Collins's Method Talk

Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (2):252-255 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revisiting the Question.Jonathan S. Marko - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):77-104.
Response to Collins.Mark Addis - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):427-429.
Revisiting the Question.Jonathan S. Marko - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):77-104.
The Sword did it: A greek explanation for suicide.F. S. Naiden - 2015 - Classical Quarterly 65 (1):85-95.
Revisiting Gender-Inclusive God-Talk.J. Aaron Simmons & Mason Marshall - 2008 - Philosophy and Theology 20 (1-2):243-263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
5 (#1,505,296)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Objectivity for these times.Thomas F. Gieryn - 1994 - Perspectives on Science 2 (3):324-349.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals.William M. Epstein - 1990 - Science, Technology and Human Values 15 (1):9-38.
The bias of science.Brian Martin - 1979 - Canberra: Society for Social Responsibility in Science.

Add more references