Cognitive Science 39 (5):972-991 (2015)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Choice reaction tasks are performed faster when stimulus location corresponds to response location. This spatial stimulus–response compatibility effect affects performance at the level of action planning and execution. However, when response selection is completed before movement initiation, the Simon effect arises only at the planning level. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether when a precocious response selection is requested, the Simon effect can be detected on the kinematics characterizing the online control phase of a non-ballistic movement. Participants were presented with red or green colored squares, which could appear on the right, left, above, or below a central cross. Depending on the square's color, participants had to release one of two buttons, then reach toward and press a corresponding lateral pad. We found evidence of the Simon effect on both action planning and on-line control. Moreover, the investigation of response conflict at the level of previous trials, a factor that might determine interference at the level of the current response, revealed a conflict adaptation process across trials. Results are discussed in terms of current theories concerned with the Simon effect and the distinction between action planning and control
|
Keywords | Simon effect Motor control Spatial compatibility Action planning Kinematic parameterization Conflict adaptation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/cogs.12188 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Separate Visual Representations in the Planning and Control of Action.Scott Glover - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
Numeric Comparison in a Visually-Guided Manual Reaching Task.Joo-Hyun Song & Ken Nakayama - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):994-1003.
How Decisions Evolve: The Temporal Dynamics of Action Selection.Stefan Scherbaum, Maja Dshemuchadse, Rico Fischer & Thomas Goschke - 2010 - Cognition 115 (3):407-416.
Visual Illusions Affect Planning but Not Control.S. Glover - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (7):288-292.
Religion and Action Control: Faith-Specific Modulation of the Simon Effect but Not Stop-Signal Performance.Bernhard Hommel, Lorenza S. Colzato, Claudia Scorolli, Anna M. Borghi & Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg - 2011 - Cognition 120 (2):177-185.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
When Affective Relation Weighs More Than the Mug Handle: Investigating Affective Affordances.Marta Caravà & Claudia Scorolli - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Reach Tracking Reveals Dissociable Processes Underlying Cognitive Control.Christopher D. Erb, Jeff Moher, David M. Sobel & Joo-Hyun Song - 2016 - Cognition 152:114-126.
Re-Enacting the Bodily Self on Stage: Embodied Cognition Meets Psychoanalysis.Claudia Scorolli - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Deconstructing the Gratton Effect: Targeting Dissociable Trial Sequence Effects in Children, Pre-Adolescents, and Adults.Christopher D. Erb & Stuart Marcovitch - 2018 - Cognition 179:150-162.
Similar books and articles
FMRI Evidence for and Behavioral Evidence Against the Planning–Control Model.Jos J. Adam & Ron F. Keulen - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-24.
Perception and Action Planning: Getting It Together.David A. Westwood & Melvyn A. Goodale - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):907-908.
The Action–Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing.Kristin L. Borreggine & Michael P. Kaschak - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (6):1097-1112.
Separate Visual Representations in the Planning and Control of Action.Scott Glover - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-10-22
Total views
41 ( #276,375 of 2,505,771 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,771 )
2014-10-22
Total views
41 ( #276,375 of 2,505,771 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,771 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads