Physician-Assisted Suicide, Disability, and Paternalism

Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):479-498 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some disability rights (DR) advocates oppose physician-assisted suicide (PAS) laws like Oregon’s on the grounds that they reflect ableist prejudice: how else can their limit on PAS eligibility to the terminally ill be explained? The paper answers this DR objection. It concedes that the limit in question cannot be defended on soft paternalist grounds, and offers a hard paternalist defense of it. The DR objection makes two mistakes: it overlooks the possibility of a hard paternalist defense of the limit, and it confuses terminal illness, which is at best one type of disability, with disability itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What does a `right' to physician-assisted suicide (PAS) legally entail?M. T. Harvey - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):271-286.
Does physician assisted suicide violate the integrity of medicine?Richard Momeyer - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Rawls and the Question of Physician-Assisted Suicide.Elvio Baccarini - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):331-345.
Conscience, referral, and physician assisted suicide.Kevin WM Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):323-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
71 (#209,992)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Danny Scoccia
New Mexico State University

Citations of this work

Paternalism and the Ill-Informed Agent.Jason Hanna - 2012 - The Journal of Ethics 16 (4):421-439.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references