Models, Theories and Narratives: Conditions for the Justification of Religious Realism [Book Review]

Religious Studies 35 (1):99-111 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can theological realism be refuted?Michael Scott & Andrew Moore - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):401-418.
Scientific Realism, the Semantic View and Evolutionary Biology.Fabio Sterpetti - 2016 - In Emiliano Ippoliti, Fabio Sterpetti & Thomas Nickles (eds.), Models and Inferences in Science. Cham: Springer. pp. 55-76.
Meta-ethics and justification.Steven Ross - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (2):91-114.
Subjectivity in Justification.Jonathan Lee Kvanvig - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Why Evolution is Really Indeterministic.R. Sansom - 2003 - Synthese 136 (2):263-279.
Sufficiency conditions for theories with recursive models.Kelleen R. Hurlburt - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 55 (3):305-320.
Knowledge, Credit, and Cognitive Agency.Daniel S. Breyer - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4):503-528.
When Analytic Narratives Explain.Anna Alexandrova - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#273,290)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Scott
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references