Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions

Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):365-390 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Relational views of equality put forward a social and political ideal of equality that aims at being a better interpretation of what social justice requires than the prevailing distributive conceptions of equality, especially luck egalitarian views. Yet it is unclear what social justice as relational equality demands in distributive terms; Elizabeth Anderson's view seems to vacate a large part of the terrain of distributive justice in favor of a minimalist, sufficiency view. Against that, this paper argues that relational equality, properly understood, requires setting stringent limits to distributive inequality, for both intrinsic and instrumental reasons. First, the relational egalitarian conception of society as a cooperative enterprise among equals gives rise to a presumption of equality in socially produced goods (and bads); inequalities in these goods have to be justified by justice-relevant reasons. Second, relational egalitarianism also delivers instrumental reasons to limit inequalities in income, wealth, and opportunities, because such inequalities may generate both opportunities for domination and inegalitarian status norms that threaten the social bases of self-respect of the worse off.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Distributive and relational equality.Christian Schemmel - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):123-148.
The fundamental disagreement between luck egalitarians and relational egalitarians.Elizabeth Anderson - 2010 - In Colin Murray Macleod (ed.), Justice and Equality. University of Calgary Press. pp. 1-23.
Luck Egalitarianism: Equality, Responsibility, and Justice.Carl Knight - 2009 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Forget about equality.Madison Powers - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
The Incompleteness of Luck Egalitarianism.Ryan Long - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:87-96.
Equality, priority and person-affecting value.Ingmar Persson - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (1):23-39.
Describing equality.Carl Knight - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (4):327 - 365.
Germ-line Enhancements and Rough Equality.Michele Loi - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):55-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
95 (#166,971)

6 months
12 (#122,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references