Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):781-782 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bunnik and colleagues argued that financial barriers do not promote informed decision-making prior to prenatal screening and raise justice concerns. If public funding is provided, however, it would seem to be important to clarify its intentions and avoid any unwarranted appearance of a medical utility of the testing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-13

Downloads
24 (#679,414)

6 months
11 (#272,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?