What fools we were

The Philosophers' Magazine 49 (49):93-97 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Don didn’t grasp what would eventually come to be one of the most successful ad campaigns ever because he didn’t recognise the person presenting the evidence as being appropriately trustworthy. He failed to know because Dr Guttman’s say-so was not enough to provide justification for a belief. But why would he think that? To get to the bottom of this, we need the help of an analytical approach known as standpoint theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fakes, frauds, and fools.Don Douglas Stewart - 1972 - Miracle Valley, Ariz.,: Don Stewart Evangelistic Assoc..
Despite Fools’ Laughter. [REVIEW]Charles J. Quirk - 1945 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 20 (4):717-717.
The Ship of Fools. [REVIEW]James Edward Tobin - 1944 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 19 (3):542-544.
“Ship of Fools” and Its Publicity.John P. McIntyre - 1963 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 38 (2):211-220.
On Plato's Ship of Fools.T. D. Seymour - 1902 - The Classical Review 16 (08):385-387.
.[author unknown] - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
59 (#266,556)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references