Visual Objects as Part of a Rational Communication Process

Abstract

In order for visual objects to be fully integrated in argumentation studies, we should be able to show how some visual objects can be part of a rational communication process and be analyzed as part of rational activity, where audiences reason their way to intentions and beliefs via their recognition of the arguer's intention to produce such results. This paper will focus on the way to enable the embedment of some visual objects in argumentation theory.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

How to define an object: Evidence from the effects of action on perception and attention.Glyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (5):534–547.
On the Philosophical Preconditions for Visual Arguments.Menashe Schwed - unknown
Are there auditory objects in the auditory domain, like visual objects in the visual domain?Sam Wilkinson - 2010 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 16 (1):9-11.
The Role of Visual Indexes in Spatial Vision and Imagery∗∗.Zenon Pylyshyn - unknown
Visual Arguments in Film.Jesús Alcolea-Banegas - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (2):259-275.
Dynamic Imagery: A Computational Model of Motion and Visual Analogy.David Croft & Paul Thagard - unknown
Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow Presentations: The Role of the Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate Change. [REVIEW]Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):425-443.
The Visual Field in Russell and Wittgenstein.Michael O'Sullivan - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (4):316-332.
Location of objects in a visual display as a function of the number of dimensions on which the objects differ.Charles W. Eriksen - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (1):56.
Reliabilism, Intuition, and Mathematical Knowledge.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2008 - Filozofia 62 (8):715-723.
The colors and shapes of visual experiences.David M. Rosenthal - 1999 - In Denis Fisette (ed.), Consciousness and Intentionality: Models and Modalities of Attribution. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 95--118.
Toward a biased competition account of object-based segregation and attention.Shaun P. Vecera - 2000 - Brain and Mind 1 (3):353-384.
Multimedia Design in the interpretation of visual communication.Wang Zhang - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):iii-iv.
On visual experience of objects: Comments on John Campbell's reference and consciousness.Mohan Matthen - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (2):195-220.
Visual argumentation in an Al Gore keynote presentation on climate change.Jens Kjeldsen & Michael K. Potter - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Visual rhetorical argumentation.Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2018 - Semiotica 2018 (220):69-94.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions.H. Paul Grice - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (2):147-177.
Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning.H. P. Grice - 1968 - Foundations of Language 4 (3):225-242.
Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950-1990.Tyler Burge - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (1):3.

View all 7 references / Add more references