- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The stillness of time and philosophical equanimity
Philosophical Studies 30 (3):145 - 159 (1976)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Time in cognitive development.Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 439-459.
How to navigate the river of time.George N. Schlesinger - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (138):91-92.
A study on the theory of “returning to the original” and “recovering nature” in chinese philosophy.Shiling Xiang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):502-519.
Sorrow and the Sage: Grief in the zhuangzi.Amy Olberding - 2007 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):339-359.
Ni K makarma: How desireless need one be?Christopher Framarin - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (3):239 – 254.
Nikāmakarma: how desireless need one be?1.Christopher Framarin - 2004 - Asian Philosophy 14 (3):239-254.
Equanimity abandoned?Laurie Lyckholm & John Quillin - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):31 – 32.
The double stillness: Speech, silence and musicality in Nietzsche.Gary Peters - 1991 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 2:11-43.
A Study on the Theory of "Returning to the Original" and "Recovering Nature" in Chinese Philosophy.Shiling Xiang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):502 - 519.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#360,193)
6 months
4 (#818,853)
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#360,193)
6 months
4 (#818,853)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Belief in robust temporal passage (probably) does not explain future-bias.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, Christian Tarsney & Hannah Tierney - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):2053-2075.
The Rationality of Near Bias toward both Future and Past Events.Preston Greene, Alex Holcombe, Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2021 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (4):905-922.
Robust passage phenomenology probably does not explain future-bias.Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, Christian Tarsney & Hannah Tierney - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-23.
Future bias in action: does the past matter more when you can affect it?Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller, James Norton & Christian Tarsney - 2020 - Synthese 198 (12):11327-11349.
How Much Do We Discount Past Pleasures?Preston Greene, Andrew J. Latham, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2022 - American Philosophical Quarterly 59 (4):367-376.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo