Sociological Theory 23 (4):368-385 (2005)

This article proposes that Goffman's "Frame Analysis" can be interpreted as a step toward unpacking the idea of context. His analysis implies a recursive model involving frames within frames. The key problem is that neither Goffman nor anyone else has clearly defined what is meant by a frame. I propose that it can be represented by a word, phrase, or proposition. A subjective context can be represented as an assembly of these items, joined together by operators such as and, since, if, not, and then. Furthermore, this model can be combined with the recursive levels of mutual awareness in earlier approaches to consensus. The combination would represent the inter subjective context: it can be used to find the minimum amount of background that would allow consensual interpretations of discourse. It could also construct a chain that links discourse to the institutional level, the micro-macro pathway from word and gesture to social structure. Goffman hinted that mathematical notation might be used to represent a frame assembly. By adding levels of awareness to such notation, it could represent social facts. Because the use of vernacular words rather than concepts is a problem in social science, Goffman's approach has a general as well as a particular significance
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00259.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
The Nature of Explanation.Kenneth James Williams Craik - 1943 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Remembering.F. C. Bartlett - 1935 - Scientia 29 (57):221.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bullshit as a Problem of Social Epistemology.Joshua Wakeham - 2017 - Sociological Theory 35 (1):15-38.
The Boundaries of Context and Their Significance.Guichun Guo - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):449-460.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
248 ( #44,426 of 2,506,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes