3. The Quid Juris

In Kant’s Deduction From Apperception: An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. De Gruyter. pp. 28-62 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the Quid Juris in Kant's Deduction? Chapter 3 from my book on the Deduction (Kant's Deduction From Apperception) provides an answer to that question, and also contains an extensive discussion of the relevant literature on this topic (Henrich, Proops, Seeberg & Longuenesse).

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783110584301-006

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Quid facti or quid Juris? The fundamental ambiguity of Gadamer's understanding of hermeneutics.Lawrence M. Hinman - 1980 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (4):512-535.
Quid juris? Quid facti?: D’une nouvelle tentative de relever une opposition capitale: Jean-Renaud Seba, Le partage de l’empirique et du transcendantal. Essai sur la normativité de la raison: Kant, Hegel, Husserl. Bruxelles, Éditions Ousia, 2006, 440 pp., 24 Euros, ISBN 978-2-87060-126-6. [REVIEW]Björn Thorsteinsson - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (2):253-258.
La teoría de los diferenciales de Salomon Maimon, la pregunta quid juris y la posibilidad de la metafísica como ciencia.Hernán Pringe - 2016 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 33 (1):81-102.
Genealogy and Jurisprudence in Fichte’s Genetic Deduction of the Categories.G. Anthony Bruno - 2018 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 35 (1):77-96.
Data-Phenomena: Quid Juris?Michele Cardani & Marco Tamborini - 2016 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 70 (4):527-549.
Maimon’s Theory of Differentials As The Elements of Intuitions.Simon Duffy - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (2):1-20.
Schelling’s Question Quid Juris.G. Anthony Bruno - forthcoming - In Sean McGrath & Kyla Bruff (eds.), The Palgrave Schelling Handbook. Palgrave.
Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.Ian Proops - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
Essay on Transcendental Philosophy.Salomon Maimon - 2010 - Continuum.
Don’t Change the Subject.Andrew Stark - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116.
Renati des Cartes Notæin Programma Quoddam Sub Finem Anni 1647. In Belgio Editum, Cum Hoc Titulo: Explicatio Mentis Humanæ Ubi Explicatur Quid Sit, & Quid Esse Possit.René Descartes, Petrus Wassenaer & Louis Elzevir - 1648 - Ex Officina Ludovici Elzevirii.
Don’t Change the Subject.Andrew Stark - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116.
Ad Epictetvm.A. J. Kronenberg - 1909 - Classical Quarterly 3 (4):258-265.
Ad Epictetvm.A. J. Kronenberg - 1909 - Classical Quarterly 3 (03):195-.
Duns Scotus’s Account of a Propter Quid Science of the Categories.Lloyd Newton - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:145-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
1,177 (#9,951)

6 months
158 (#18,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dennis Schulting
University of Warwick (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references