The Legal Suppression of Scientific Data and the Christian Virtue of "Parrhesia"

Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 35 (2):175-192 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Powerful interest groups have responded to evidence of environmental or health risks by manufacturing doubt, partially through attacks on scientists. The current legal standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence in court enables such strategies for generating doubt. In the face of attacks on their reputations and careers, researchers working on public interest science need the courage to speak the truth despite risk, which Michel Foucault described as the virtue of parrhesia. Parrhesia is also a Christian virtue shown in the willingness to witness to truth in the face of risk because of one's confidence in God. This essay argues that Christianity possesses resources to form individuals in parrhesia in ways that support the dedication to scientific truth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Issues in Data Management.Sharon S. Krag - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):743-748.
Sense of Humor as a Christian Virtue.Robert C. Roberts - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (2):177-192.
Some doubts about scientific data.Gordon N. Pinkham - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):260-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Diagnosis and Therapy in The Anticipatory Corpse: A Second Opinion.Brett McCarty - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (6):621-641.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references