The Idiocy of Strategic Reasoning. Towards an Account of Consensual Action

Analyse & Kritik 33 (1):35-56 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Practical reasoning is an agent's capacity to determine her course of behavior on the base of some evaluation of available alternatives. Reasoning is instrumental insofar as an agent decides over available alternatives by aiming to choose the best means to realize her own goals. Reasoning is strategic if the agent assumes that what the best means to realize her own goals is depends on what other agents will do. Strategic reasoning still plays a central role in influential accounts of social action. This paper first argues for the view that purely strategic reasoners are unable to achieve even the most basic and unproblematic forms of mutually beneficent coordination, and then gathers some elements of a richer account of relevant forms of practical reasoning

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-07

Downloads
20 (#720,454)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans Bernhard Schmid
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theories of team agency.Robert Sugden & Natalie Gold - 2007 - In Fabienne Peter & Hans Bernhard Schmid (eds.), Rationality and Commitment. Oxford University Press.
Rationality and salience.Margaret Gilbert - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 57 (1):61-77.
Gauthier on Coordination.C. Provis - 1977 - Dialogue 16 (3):507-509.

Add more references