The Debate on Probable Opinions in the Scholastic Tradition

Boston: Brill (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A portrait of scholastic approaches to a qualified disagreement of opinions, focusing on the antagonism of scholastic probabilism and anti-probabilism in the early modern era.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Radical Cartesianism of Robert Desgabets and the Scholastic Heritage.Han Thomas Adriaenssen - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):46-68.
The Emotions.H. J. Wirtenberger - 1928 - Modern Schoolman 4 (7):113-114.
Medieval logic.Philotheus Boehner - 1952 - [Manchester, Eng.]: Manchester University Press.
A Rudimentary Probe Into Taiwan's Neo-scholasicism.Qi-Shui Wang - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (3):270-282.
Philosophy and the Sciences.[author unknown] - 1928 - Modern Schoolman 4 (4):56-57.
Individual as Species Infima. Scholastic and Anti-Scholastic Sources for a Leibnizian 'Paradox'.Stefano Di Bella - 2007 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18:545-571.
Ontology and Logic: The Case of Scholastic and Late-Scholastic Theory of Relations.Massimo Mugnai - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (3):532-553.
Dictionary of scholastic philosophy.Bernard J. Wuellner - 1956 - Milwaukee,: Bruce Pub. Co..

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-05

Downloads
2 (#1,750,398)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy.Miroslav Hanke - 2019 - History and Philosophy of Logic 40 (4):355-373.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references