The Baby K Case: A Search for the Elusive Standard of Medical Care

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (1):9-18 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An anencephalic infant, who came to be known as Baby K, was born at Fairfax Hospial in Falls Church, Virginia, on October 13, 1992. From, the moment of birth and repeatedly thereafter, the baby's mother insisted that aggressive measures be pursued, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ventilator support, to keep the baby alive as long as possible. The physicians complied. However, following the baby's second admission for respiratory failure, the hospital sought declaratory relief from the court permitting it to forgo emergency life support on the grounds that “a requirement to provide respiratory assistance would exceed the prevailing standard of medical care,” and that “because any treatment of their condition is futile, the prevailing standard of medical care for infants with anencephaly is to provide warmth, nutrition, and hydration.” The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of the baby's mother, citing the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act , which contained no “standard of care” exception to the requirement to provide “treatment necessary to prevent the material deterioration of the individual's condition.” An appeal to the United States Supreme Court was rejected. The baby died some two and one-half years later of cardiac arrest during her sixth visit to the emergency department of Fairfax Hospital for respiratory failure

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One Advocate's Viewpoint: Conflicts and Tensions in the Baby K Case.Ellen J. Flannery - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):7-12.
Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence.Brian D. Earp - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (5):287-289.
When Do Organs Become “Spare Parts”?Thomasine Kushner - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (4):349.
Baby T.David A. Goldstein - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (4):345.
Baby K: Medical Futility and the Free Exercise of Religion.Stephen G. Post - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):20-26.
Just Because You Can—Doesn’t Mean You Should.Mindy B. Statter - 2015 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (1):22-24.
Medical Futility in Resuscitation: Value Judgement and Clinical Judgement.Michael Coogan - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (2):197.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
92 (#226,879)

6 months
11 (#327,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Knowing When to Stop: The Limits of Medicine.Nancy S. Jecker - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (3):5-8.
Medical Futility: The Duty Not to Treat.Nancy S. Jecker & Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (2):151.
Conflict Between Doctor and Patient.Susan M. Wolf - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (3-4):197-203.

Add more references