The ABC of algorithmic aversion: not agent, but benefits and control determine the acceptance of automated decision-making

AI and Society:1-14 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


While algorithmic decision-making (ADM) is projected to increase exponentially in the coming decades, the academic debate on whether people are ready to accept, trust, and use ADM as opposed to human decision-making is ongoing. The current research aims at reconciling conflicting findings on ‘algorithmic aversion’ in the literature. It does so by investigating algorithmic aversion while controlling for two important characteristics that are often associated with ADM: increased benefits (monetary and accuracy) and decreased user control. Across three high-powered (Ntotal = 1192), preregistered 2 (agent: algorithm/human) × 2 (benefits: high/low) × 2 (control: user control/no control) between-subjects experiments, and two domains (finance and dating), the results were quite consistent: there is little evidence for a default aversion against algorithms and in favor of human decision makers. Instead, users accept or reject decisions and decisional agents based on their predicted benefits and the ability to exercise control over the decision.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Call for papers.[author unknown] - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):457-458.
Call for papers.[author unknown] - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):453-455.
The inside out mirror.Sue Pearson - 2021 - AI and Society 36 (3):1069-1070.
A Look into Modern Working Life.Lena Skio¨ld - 2002 - AI and Society 16 (1-2):166-167.
The scientist of the scientist.Tomer Simon - 2024 - AI and Society 39 (2):803-804.


Added to PP

11 (#1,081,857)

6 months
7 (#364,455)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?