Sustained posterior contralateral activity indicates re-entrant target processing in visual change detection: an EEG study

, &
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2014.00247

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Visuomotor processing in unilateral neglect.Marlene Behrmann & Daniel V. Meegan - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):381-409.
Change Detection.Ronald A. Rensink - 2002 - Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1):245-277.
The change probability effect: Incidental learning, adaptability, and shared visual working memory resources.Amanda E. van Lamsweerde & Melissa R. Beck - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1676-1689.
Metacognitive errors in change detection: Missing the gap between lab and life.Daniel Smilek, John D. Eastwood, Michael G. Reynolds & Alan Kingstone - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):52-57.
Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing.Ronald A. Rensink - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7:345-376.
Do Synesthetic Colors Grab Attention in Visual Search?Berit Brogaard, Kristian Marlow & Kevin Rice - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (4):701-714.
An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness.Mika Koivisto & Antti Revonsuo - 2003 - Psychophysiology 40 (3):423-429.
A comparison of masking by visual and transcranial magnetic stimulation: implications for the study of conscious and unconscious visual processing.Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Tony Ro & Haluk Ogmen - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (4):829-843.
The study of orthographic processing has broadened research in visual word recognition.Carol Whitney - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):309-310.
Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.Alberto Gallace, Sophia Zeeden, Brigitte Röder & Charles Spence - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):215-229.
Concepts about agency constrain beliefs about visual experience.Daniel T. Levin - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):875-888.
Change blindness blindness: Beliefs about the roles of intention and scene complexity in change detection.Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie Angelone - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):31-51.
Implicit processing of tactile information: Evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.David Pritchett, Alberto Gallace & Charles Spence - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):534-546.
Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task.Melissa R. Beck, Bonnie L. Angelone, Daniel T. Levin, Matthew S. Peterson & D. Alexander Varakin - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1192-1208.
Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?Diego Fernandez-Duque & Ian Thornton - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7 (1):323-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.R. Desimone & J. Duncan - 1995 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1):193-222.
Why visual attention and awareness are different.Victor A. F. Lamme - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):12-18.

Add more references