Scholastic Probability as Rational Assertability: The Rise of Theories of Reasonable Disagreement

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96 (2):202-231 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

:The scholastics used.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/agph-2014-0010

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
An appraisal of comparative probability.Vincenzo Fano - unknown
Waldron on law and disagreement.Thomas Christiano - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):513-543.
Entitlement and mutually recognized reasonable disagreement.Allan Hazlett - 2013 - Episteme (1):1-25.
Jeremy Waldron on law and disagreement.David Estlund - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 99 (1):111-128.
Peer Disagreement and Two Principles of Rational Belief.Theodore J. Everett - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):273-286.
Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Disagreement about Fairness.Christopher McMahon - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):91-110.
Resurrecting logical probability.James Franklin - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (2):277-305.
Is quantum probability rational?Alasdair I. Houston & Karoline Wiesner - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):291 - 292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-28

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references