Abstract
Wrath is often understood as the dark and irrational side of God that can be appeased only through the offering of a scapegoat. The metaphor of a human “standing in the breach” defies this common understanding and points to the moral dimension of God's wrath.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/002096439605200103
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

God’s Standing to Forgive.Brandon Warmke - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (4):381-402.
Arendt, Heidegger, Jaspers: Thinking Through the Breach in Tradition.Antonia Grunenberg - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74:1003-1028.
Arendt, Heidegger, Jaspers: Thinking Through the Breach in Tradition.Antonia Grunenberg - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74 (4):1003-1028.
Understanding Standing: Permission to Deflect Reasons.Ori Herstein - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3109-3132.
Manipulation Arguments and the Standing to Blame.Matt King - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (1):1-20.
Does God Have the Moral Standing to Blame?Patrick Todd - 2018 - Faith and Philosophy 35 (1):33-55.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
18 ( #594,699 of 2,462,518 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,164 of 2,462,518 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes