Recognize Everyone’s Interests: An Algorithm for Ethical Decision-Making about Trade-Off Problems

Business Ethics Quarterly 31 (3):450-473 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article addresses a dilemma about autonomous vehicles: how to respond to trade-off scenarios in which all possible responses involve the loss of life but there is a choice about whose life or lives are lost. I consider four options: kill fewer people, protect passengers, equal concern for survival, and recognize everyone’s interests. I solve this dilemma via what I call the new trolley problem, which seeks a rationale for the intuition that it is unethical to kill a smaller number of people to avoid killing a greater number of people based on numbers alone. I argue that killing a smaller number of people to avoid killing a greater number of people based on numbers alone is unethical because it disrespects the humanity of the individuals in the smaller-numbered group. I defend the recognize-everyone’s-interests algorithm, which will probably kill fewer people but will not do so based on numbers alone.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The New Problem of Numbers in Morality.Fiona Woollard - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):631-641.
Epicureanism and the Wrongness of Killing.Tim Burkhardt - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 24 (2):177-192.
Interesy obiektywne.Daniel Goldstick - 1988 - Etyka 24:229-247.
Matters of life and death.Todd Nugent Karhu - 2019 - Dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science
Taurek, numbers and probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.
A Reappraisal of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing.David K. Chan - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein (eds.), Action, Ethics, and Responsibility. MIT Press. pp. 25-45.
John Rawls.Alex Voorhoeve - 2004 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), The Great Thinkers A-Z. Continuum. pp. 199-201.
Can Machines Think? An Old Question Reformulated.Achim Hoffmann - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (2):203-212.
Anti-Liberal Democracy.Miguel Angel Martinez-Saenz - 2001 - Dissertation, University of South Florida

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-07

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tobey Scharding
Stanford University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1907 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 30 (4):401-401.

View all 38 references / Add more references