On the Philosophical Preconditions for Visual Arguments

Abstract

The question is what are the preconditions for being able to rephrase visual objects in propositional form and consequently in argumentational terms. The idea is to identify the fundamentals of a linguistic-semiotic analysis of visual objects, which rest on philosophical notions in logic, linguistics and aesthetics.

Categories

Keywords

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,507

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Visual arguments and meta-arguments.Ian J. Dove - unknown
Visual Objects as Part of a Rational Communication Process.Menashe Schwed - unknown
Rational reconstruction: Preconditions and limits.Adrian-Paul Iliescu - 1996 - Theoria 11 (3):33-47.
A Picture Held us Captive: The Later Wittgenstein and Visual Argumentation.Steven W. Patterson - 2011 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2 (2):105-134.
Should Visual Arguments be Propositional in Order to be Arguments?Georges Roque - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):177-195.
Probative Norms for Multimodal Visual Arguments.J. Anthony Blair - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):217-233.
Categorizing Visual Argumentation Processes: Visual commonplaces in civic culture.Maceio Ilon Lauer - unknown
What Is Visual in Visual Argumentation?Georges Roque - unknown
Visual perception is not visual awareness.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):985-985.
Representationalism and the determinacy of visual content.Ben Bronner - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):227-239.
Visual methods for argument verification and semantic analysis.Alfonso Cabanzo - 2011 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 19 (Logic, visual methods):79-105.
Logic, Art and Argument.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Visual analogies and arguments.Ian Dove & Marcello Guarini - unknown
Können Bilder Argumente sein?Nicola Mößner - 2012 - In Manfred Harth & Jakob Steinbrenner (eds.), Bilder als Gründe. Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Conjectural paradigm and Empathy as Embodied Mechanism.Noemi De Haro García & María G. Navarro - 2012 - Purlieu. A Philosophical Journal 1 (4):83-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
7 (#1,156,406)

6 months
1 (#870,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions.H. Paul Grice - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (2):147-177.
Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning.H. P. Grice - 1968 - Foundations of Language 4 (3):225-242.
Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950-1990.Tyler Burge - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (1):3.

View all 8 references / Add more references