Kierkegaard contra Hegel on the'Absolute Paradox'

Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 59:54-66 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion Hegel propounds three inter-related theses: (1) The radical continuity of religion and philosophy. (2) The view that philosophy renders in conceptual form the essence of what Christianity consists in and thus transcends the merely subjective vantage-point of faith. (3) Philosophy alone shows Christianity to be rational and necessary. Kierkegaard’s pseudonym, Johannes Climacus, attacks all three of these theses in Conculding Unscientific Postscript, and he introduces the category of the ‘absolute paradox’ (the Christian Incarnation) in order to do so. It is consequently a mistake to think, as Jon Stewart (2003) does, that Climacus has no quarrel with Hegel himself, but only with the Danish neo-Hegelians such as Heiberg and Martensen. For as the present paper will show, Climacus and Hegel in fact have diametrically opposed conceptions of Christianity and so could not fail to be at loggerheads with each other

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Be as No‐One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
Understanding Kierkegaard’s Johannes Climacus in the Postscript.Paul Muench - 2007 - In Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Hermann Deuser & K. Brian Söderquist (eds.), Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook. de Gruyter. pp. 424-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
26 (#443,418)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Genia Schönbaumsfeld
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references