Ideomotoryczna teoria działania w ujęciu Williama Jamesa

Diametros 43:137-157 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper discusses the view of William James on the contribution of will to our decisions to act. According to James, our voluntary action, which for him is strongly connected with an intention to do something, occurs when the subject of the action knows its sensorimotor effects. An attempt has been made to defend James’ view and rebut popular criticisms aiming to undermine the role of knowledge in voluntary action. The paper also offers to identify a contemporary context for the ideomotor theory of action. It is argued that such a context is provided by the enactive theory of perception

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Judging as a non-voluntary action.Conor McHugh - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (2):245 - 269.
Why volition is a foundation issue for psychology.Bernard J. Baars - 1993 - Consciousness and Cognition 2 (4):281-309.
How we act: causes, reasons, and intentions.Berent Enç - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A New Imagery Debate: Enactive and Sensorimotor Accounts.Lucia Foglia & J. Kevin O’Regan - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):181-196.
Free choice & voluntary action.Parashkev Nachev - 2010 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 16 (1):87-98.
Identity dynamics, action and context.Anne Marie Costalat-Founeau - 1999 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (3):289–300.
Consciousness in act and action.Keith Hossack - 2003 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3):187-203.
Intentional action first.Yair Levy - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):705-718.
Perception and action: The taste test.Alessandra Tanesini & Richard Gray - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):718-734.
Involuntariness, Agency and the Criminal Law.Dennis Walter Klimchuk - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Consideraciones epistemológicas acerca del “sentido de agencia”. Epistemological Requirements of the Sense of Agency.Fernando Broncano - 2006 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 39:7-27.
Corporate intention and corporate action.Raimo Tuomela - 1993 - Analyse & Kritik 15 (1):11-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-15

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Book Chapter].M. Ito, Y. Miyashita & Edmund T. Rolls (eds.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references