Iconic plurality

Linguistics and Philosophy 42 (1):45-108 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ASL can express plurals by repeating a noun, in an unpunctuated fashion, in different parts of signing space. We argue that this construction may come with a rich iconic component: the geometric arrangement of the repetitions provides information about the arrangement of the denoted plurality; in addition, the number and speed of the repetitions provide information about the size of the denoted plurality. Interestingly, the shape of the repetitions may introduce a new singular discourse referent when a vertex can be inferred to denote a singular object. Thus one may point towards the first or last iteration of a horizontal repetition of BOOK to denote the left- or right-edge of the corresponding row. This yields a remarkable interaction between iconic semantics and standard logical semantics. We show that our analysis extends to ‘punctuated’ repetitions, which involve clearly individuated iterations of a singular noun. While these may initially look like coordinated indefinites, they are better handled by the same iconic framework as plural, unpunctuated repetitions. Some repetition-based mass terms also give rise to iconic effects, and to different readings depending on whether the repetition is continuous, unpunctuated, or punctuated. Our analysis highlights the need for a formal semantics with iconicity to study the integration of such iconic and logical conditions. It also raises a question: can similar facts be found in spoken language when gestures are taken into account? We suggest that several effects can be replicated, especially when one considers examples involving ‘pro-speech gestures’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Iconic variables.Philippe Schlenker, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (2):91-149.
Iconic features.Philippe Schlenker - 2014 - Natural Language Semantics 22 (4):299-356.
Iconic Architecture and the Culture-ideology of Consumerism.Leslie Sklair - 2010 - Theory, Culture and Society 27 (5):135-159.
Bildwissenschaft in Byzanz. Ein iconic turn avant la lettre?Emmanuel Alloa - 2010 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 69:11-36.
From mimicry to mime by way of mimesis.Göran Sonesson - 2010 - Sign Systems Studies 38 (1-4):18-65.
Iconic Experience in Art and Life.Jeffrey C. Alexander - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (5):1-19.
The body language: a semiotic reading of Szasz’ Anti-psychiatry.Valeria Lelli - 2011 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (2):34-36.
Concepts are not icons.Christopher Gauker - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):127.
Iconic enrichments: Signs vs. gestures.Philippe Schlenker - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-04

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philippe Schlenker
Institut Jean Nicod

References found in this work

Semantics in generative grammar.Irene Heim & Angelika Kratzer - 1998 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Angelika Kratzer.
Using Language.Herbert H. Clark - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Gesture and Thought.David McNeill - 2005 - University of Chicago Press.
Gesture and Thought.David McNeill - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references