Logica Universalis 1 (2):355-376 (2007)
Abstract |
. The term inversion principle goes back to Lorenzen who coined it in the early 1950s. It was later used by Prawitz and others to describe the symmetric relationship between introduction and elimination inferences in natural deduction, sometimes also called harmony. In dealing with the invertibility of rules of an arbitrary atomic production system, Lorenzen’s inversion principle has a much wider range than Prawitz’s adaptation to natural deduction. It is closely related to definitional reflection, which is a principle for reasoning on the basis of rule-based atomic definitions, proposed by Hallnäs and Schroeder-Heister. After presenting definitional reflection and the inversion principle, it is shown that the inversion principle can be formally derived from definitional reflection, when the latter is viewed as a principle to establish admissibility. Furthermore, the relationship between definitional reflection and the inversion principle is investigated on the background of a universalization principle, called the ω- principle, which allows one to pass from the set of all defined substitution instances of a sequent to the sequent itself.
|
Keywords | Proof theory proof-theoretic semantics definitional reflection inversion principle admissibility inductive definition logic programming operative logic Lorenzen |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s11787-007-0018-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
A Natural Extension of Natural Deduction.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1284-1300.
Validity Concepts in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2006 - Synthese 148 (3):525-571.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
General-Elimination Stability.Bruno Miguel Jacinto & Stephen Louis Read - 2017 - Studia Logica 105 (2):361-405.
Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister & Thomas Piecha (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
On Inversion Principles.Enrico Moriconi & Laura Tesconi - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (2):103-113.
Speech Acts, Categoricity, and the Meanings of Logical Connectives.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):445-467.
Categorical Harmony and Path Induction.Patrick Walsh - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):301-321.
View all 16 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Inversion by Definitional Reflection and the Admissibility of Logical Rules.Wagner Campos Sanz & Thomas Piecha - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):550-569.
Spectrum Inversion Without a Difference in Representation is Impossible.Jeff Speaks - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (3):339-361.
The Completeness of Intuitionistic Logic with Respect to a Validity Concept Based on an Inversion Principle.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 1983 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 12 (3):359 - 377.
Truth, Conservativeness, and Provability: Reply to Cieslinski.J. Ketland - 2010 - Mind 119 (474):423-436.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
82 ( #141,762 of 2,507,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,713 )
2009-01-28
Total views
82 ( #141,762 of 2,507,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,713 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads