Genetic Affinity and the Right to ‘Three-parent IVF’

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 34 (12):1577-1580 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


With the recent report of a live birth after use of Mitochondrial replacement therapy, sometimes called ‘Three-parent IVF’, the clinical application of the technique is fast becoming a reality. While the United Kingdom allows the procedure under regulatory scrutiny, it remains effectively outlawed in many other countries. We argue that such prohibitions may violate individuals’ procreative rights, grounded in individuals’ interest in genetic affinity. The interest in genetic affinity was recently endorsed by Singapore’s highest court, reflecting an emphasis on the importance of biological ties found across the globe. We apply that reasoning to make the case for a right to ‘Three-parent IVF’.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is the Value of Three-Parent IVF?Tina Rulli - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (4):38-47.
Parental genetic shaping and parental environmental shaping.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267):20-31.
Is ‘Assisted Reproduction’ Reproduction?Monika Piotrowska - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (270):138-157.
Ancestor embryos: embryonic gametes and genetic parenthood.Helen Watt - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11):759-761.
Ethical Implications of Permitting Mitochondrial Replacement.Katarina Lee - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (4):619-631.
What makes a parent? It's not black or white.G. Fuscaldo - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):66-67.


Added to PP

215 (#70,061)

6 months
45 (#46,638)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

G. Owen Schaefer
National University of Singapore

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references