Equivalents of Mingle and positive paradox

Studia Logica 77 (1):117 - 128 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Relevant logic is a proper subset of classical logic. It does not include among its theorems any ofpositive paradox A (B A).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Probabilistic causality and Simpson's paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Confirmation, paradox, and logic.Leif Eriksen - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-687.
The train paradox.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):437-438.
Moore’s Paradox and Moral Motivation.Michael Cholbi - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):495-510.
Natural deduction and Curry's paradox.Susan Rogerson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive?Gregor Damschen - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
Substructural logics with Mingle.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):227-249.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#300,476)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A plea for KR.Alison Duncan Kerr - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3047-3071.
Two pretabular linear extensions of relevance logic R.Asadollah Fallahi - 2021 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 31 (2):154-179.
The Weak Variable Sharing Property.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2023 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic (1):85-99.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references