Authors
Severin Schroeder
University of Reading
John Preston
University of Reading
Abstract
In the first chapter of his book Logical Foundations of Probability, Rudolf Carnap introduced and endorsed a philosophical methodology which he called the method of ‘explication’. P.F. Strawson took issue with this methodology, but it is currently undergoing a revival. In a series of articles, Patrick Maher has recently argued that explication is an appropriate method for ‘formal epistemology’, has defended it against Strawson’s objection, and has himself put it to work in the philosophy of science in further clarification of the very concepts on which Carnap originally used it (degree of confirmation, and probability), as well as some concepts to which Carnap did not apply it (such as justified degree of belief). We shall outline Carnap’s original idea, plus Maher’s recent application of such a methodology, and then seek to show that the problem Strawson raised for it has not been dealt with. The method is indeed, we argue, problematic and therefore not obviously superior to the ‘descriptive’ method associated with Strawson. Our targets will not only be Carnapians, though, for what we shall say also bears negatively on a project that Paul Horwich has pursued under the name ‘therapeutic’, or ‘Wittgensteinian’ Bayesianism. Finally, explication, as we shall suggest and as Carnap recognised, is not the only route to philosophical enlightenment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.30965/26664275-02201007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Explication, Description and Enlightenment.Severin Schroeder & John Preston - 2019 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 22:106-120.
La explicación del concepto de reducción.Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann - 1988 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 4 (1):139-161.
On the practical enlightenment.You Zhanshi - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (11):1034-1056.
An Explication of 'Explication'.Joseph F. Hanna - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (1):28-44.
Explication.Moritz Cordes, and & Geo Siegwart - 2018 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment.Graham Bird - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):448-451.
Explication Defended.Patrick Maher - 2007 - Studia Logica 86 (2):331-341.
The Constituents of an Explication.Moritz Cordes - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):983-1010.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-21

Total views
39 ( #281,564 of 2,463,233 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,543 of 2,463,233 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes