Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse, eds., Kant and the Early Moderns. [Book Review]

Philosophy in Review 30 (4):263-265 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 1-8.
Kant and the Early Moderns.Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.) - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Review: Garber & Longuenesse (ed), Kant and the early moderns. [REVIEW]Kevin J. Harrelson - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):111-112.
What Leibniz really said?Daniel Garber - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press.
Kant's "I think" versus Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 9--31.
Review: Longuenesse, Kant on the Human Standpoint[REVIEW]Emily Carson - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
Hegel's critique of metaphysics.Béatrice Longuenesse - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reply to the comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg.Henry Allison - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
14 (#846,545)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references