Clean, Proper and Tidy Are More Than the Absence of Dirty, Disgusting and Wrong

Emotion Review 3 (3):264-266 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The desire to feel clean and pure might not merely be the absence of contamination and resulting feelings of disgust. Instead, it might have a social function because early in evolution social grooming not only involved improved personal hygiene and cleanliness, but also increased group cohesion. Thus, knowing that one’s body is clean, proper and tidy might have social implications that go beyond morality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forgiving for good.Eve Garrard & David McNaughton - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):43-48.
Everyday surface aesthetic qualities: "Neat," "messy," "clean," "dirty".Thomas Leddy - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):259-268.
The Meaning of Disgust.Colin McGinn - 2011 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
The Morality of Pollution Permits.Paul Steidlmeier - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (2):133-150.
Clean talk in genetics.Greg Myers - 1992 - Social Epistemology 6 (2):193 – 202.
What proper names, and their absence, do not demonstrate.Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):288-289.
Objective evidence and absence: Comment on Sober.Michael Strevens - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100.
Choice and Culpability.Dylan Brian Futter - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (2):173-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-23

Downloads
18 (#762,892)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Emotion and Morality: A Tasting Menu.Joshua D. Greene - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):227-229.

Add more citations